Avocado Oil



 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

Get Answers to Our Firm's Most Frequently Asked Questions

Is Your “Pure” Avocado Oil Actually Avocado?

If you purchased avocado oil you may be entitled to participate in a class-action lawsuit.

What is Avocado Oil?

Avocados are actually fruits. Avocado oil is derived from the natural oil pressed from the pulp of the avocado. Almost 70% of avocado oil consists of heart-healthy oleic acid, a monounsaturated omega-9 fatty acid. Additionally, around 12% of avocado oil is saturated fat and about 13% is polyunsaturated fat.

The flavor of virgin avocado oil can differ by variety and region. In general, authentic, fresh, virgin avocado oil tastes grassy, buttery, and a little bit like mushrooms. Virgin avocado oil should be green in color, whereas refined avocado oil is light yellow and almost clear due to pigments removed during refining.

What are the Touted Benefits of Avocado Oil?

There are many purported benefits of avocado oil including:

Avocado Oil Scams

Many doctors and health professionals recommend using healthy oils, such as avocado oil. This increase in the popularity of avocado oil has also increased the prevalence of avocado oil scams. Scams can include falsely advertising a product as avocado oil, when it is, in fact, a cheaper and less healthy alternative. Consuming such products may have dangerous effects on the health of adults and children, especially if it is being replaced with oils that have common allergens, such as peanut oil.

Shocking Results of UC Davis Study

According to new research from food science experts at the University of California, Davis, the vast majority of avocado oil sold in the U.S. is of poor quality, mislabeled, or adulterated with other oils. In the country’s first extensive study of commercial avocado oil quality and purity, UC Davis researchers report that at least 82 percent of test samples were either stale before the expiration date or mixed with other oils. In three cases, bottles labeled as “pure” or “extra virgin” avocado oil contained nearly 100 percent soybean oil, an oil commonly used in processed foods that’s much less expensive to produce.

If you have purchased avocado oil and believe you may have been the victim of false advertising and fraud, our attorneys are happy to provide a free consultation. Serving nationwide!

  1. Potential to reduce cholesterol and improve cardiovascular health;
  2. Potential to reduce the risk of cataracts and macular degeneration;
  3. Potential to aid in the absorption of important nutrients such as carotenoids
  4. Reduction in symptoms of arthritis
  5. Prevention of gum disease
  6. Improved symptoms of psoriasis and accelerated wound healing
  7. Neutralization of free radicals

Avocado Oil Class Action Lawsuit

 Investigation Evaluation

Fill out the form below for a free case evaluation. If you qualify, a lawyer will contact you to discuss the

details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Contact Us

Highly Esteemed & Accomplished



Galvan v. Doe

$6,750,000

By Grombacher February 20, 2026
California Telehealth Company Facing Class Action Over Alleged Physician Misclassification and Unpaid Wages Westlake Village, California – A new class and collective action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Mochi Medical CA, P.C., Mochi Medical, P.A., and Mochi Health Corp., alleging widespread wage-and-hour violations stemming from the alleged misclassification of healthcare providers as independent contractors. The complaint asserts that the defendants operate a telehealth platform for weight management services and a related professional medical group that provides prescription services based on referrals from that platform. According to the lawsuit, the companies uniformly classified physicians and other healthcare professionals as independent contractors despite exercising significant control over their work. The named plaintiff, Dr. Frank Cioppettini, worked remotely as a licensed physician for the defendants from approximately December 10, 2024, to February 14, 2025. The complaint alleges that during this time, he and similarly situated providers were subject to company-directed policies, scheduling requirements, supervision, and performance evaluation, factors that, under California’s “ABC test,” may indicate employee status rather than independent contractor status.  The lawsuit contends that by misclassifying healthcare providers, the defendants failed to provide key protections guaranteed to employees under California law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). These alleged violations include failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay all wages owed, failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements, failure to timely pay final wages upon termination, and failure to reimburse necessary business expenses. Specifically, the complaint alleges violations of California Labor Code sections 510 and 1198 for unpaid overtime; failure to pay minimum and all wages; wage statement violations; waiting time penalties; failure to reimburse business expenses; and unfair business practices. According to the complaint, the defendants maintained uniform scheduling and timekeeping practices across states, and the alleged policies were administered from California. The proposed class includes healthcare professionals classified as contractors whose employment relationships were governed by California law within four years prior to the filing of the action. The lawsuit further alleges that hundreds of providers may have been affected. “This action challenges a uniform scheme to misclassify healthcare providers as independent contractors, despite Defendants’ pervasive control over their work and integration of their services into Defendants’ core business. As a result of this misclassification, employees were unlawfully denied overtime, minimum wages, expense reimbursement, accurate wage statements, and timely final pay,” said attorney Marcus Bradley. The case is styled Frank Cioppettini v. Mochi Medical CA, P.C ., et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-01260, USDC Northern District of California.
By Grombacher November 3, 2025
Spotting false advertising in 2025 is tougher than ever. Bradley/Grombacher breaks down how to protect yourself and take legal action.

Success Stories

Reviews

We highly recommend!



“Marcus guided us through the entire process with professionalism & compassion. His knowledge, thoroughness, and experience ensured the best possible outcome for our case and we highly recommend him.”

- Kylie & Daniel C.

Schedule a Free Consultation



Contact Us