Beauty Products



 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

 Schedule a Free Consultation Today

Contact Us

Get Answers to Our Firm's Most Frequently Asked Questions

Are Your Beauty Products Properly Advertised?

Fighting for Victims of Deceptive Advertising Nationwide

The Food Drug and Cosmetic Act defines cosmetics as articles intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions.

Included in this definition are products such as:

  • Skin creams
  • Lotions
  • Perfumes
  • Lipsticks
  • Fingernail polishes
  • Eye and facial make-up preparations
  • Shampoos
  • Permanent waves
  • Hair colors
  • Toothpastes
  • Deodorants
  • And any material intended for use as a component of a cosmetic product

Don’t delay – act now by scheduling a free initial consultation with to see if you have grounds to file a false advertising lawsuit. Contact us online or call Bradley/Grombacher LLP at (866) 881-0403 today to arrange yours. Accepting clients nationwide!


These ads are from popular magazines, such as:

According to a study done by Valdosta State University, four out of five beauty care brands do not deliver their own claims. Using misleading advertisement, these brands are claiming that their products can make beauty miracles without substantiation. In the previous study mentioned, the authors examined 757 claims by beauty and personal care brands from 300 full-page ads.

What Are the Types of Deceptive Advertising?

  • Vogue
  • Marie Claire
  • And Glamour

Deceptive advertising and labeling take many forms when it comes to beauty products but some recent trends include:

  • Labeling Products as Clean that Contain Toxic Chemicals
  • Labeling Products as Vegan when they Contain Beeswax or other Animal Byproducts.
  • Labeling Products as “Oil Free” That Actually Contain Oil
  • Labeling Phyto-Retinol Products as Retinol


If you have purchased beauty products and believe you may have been the victim of false advertising on beauty products, our attorneys are happy to provide a free consultation. Accepting clients nationwide!

All the claims in the ads are classified into four labels: outright lie, omission, vague, and acceptable. According to the study, out of the 757 claims, 621 are only claims, 18% of the claims are acceptable, while only 14% of the claims are trustworthy.

Avocado Oil Class Action Lawsuit

 Investigation Evaluation

Fill out the form below for a free case evaluation. If you qualify, a lawyer will contact you to discuss the

details of your potential case at no charge to you.

Contact Us

Highly Esteemed & Accomplished



Galvan v. Doe

$6,750,000

By Grombacher February 20, 2026
California Telehealth Company Facing Class Action Over Alleged Physician Misclassification and Unpaid Wages Westlake Village, California – A new class and collective action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Mochi Medical CA, P.C., Mochi Medical, P.A., and Mochi Health Corp., alleging widespread wage-and-hour violations stemming from the alleged misclassification of healthcare providers as independent contractors. The complaint asserts that the defendants operate a telehealth platform for weight management services and a related professional medical group that provides prescription services based on referrals from that platform. According to the lawsuit, the companies uniformly classified physicians and other healthcare professionals as independent contractors despite exercising significant control over their work. The named plaintiff, Dr. Frank Cioppettini, worked remotely as a licensed physician for the defendants from approximately December 10, 2024, to February 14, 2025. The complaint alleges that during this time, he and similarly situated providers were subject to company-directed policies, scheduling requirements, supervision, and performance evaluation, factors that, under California’s “ABC test,” may indicate employee status rather than independent contractor status.  The lawsuit contends that by misclassifying healthcare providers, the defendants failed to provide key protections guaranteed to employees under California law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). These alleged violations include failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay all wages owed, failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements, failure to timely pay final wages upon termination, and failure to reimburse necessary business expenses. Specifically, the complaint alleges violations of California Labor Code sections 510 and 1198 for unpaid overtime; failure to pay minimum and all wages; wage statement violations; waiting time penalties; failure to reimburse business expenses; and unfair business practices. According to the complaint, the defendants maintained uniform scheduling and timekeeping practices across states, and the alleged policies were administered from California. The proposed class includes healthcare professionals classified as contractors whose employment relationships were governed by California law within four years prior to the filing of the action. The lawsuit further alleges that hundreds of providers may have been affected. “This action challenges a uniform scheme to misclassify healthcare providers as independent contractors, despite Defendants’ pervasive control over their work and integration of their services into Defendants’ core business. As a result of this misclassification, employees were unlawfully denied overtime, minimum wages, expense reimbursement, accurate wage statements, and timely final pay,” said attorney Marcus Bradley. The case is styled Frank Cioppettini v. Mochi Medical CA, P.C ., et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-01260, USDC Northern District of California.
By Grombacher November 3, 2025
Spotting false advertising in 2025 is tougher than ever. Bradley/Grombacher breaks down how to protect yourself and take legal action.

Success Stories

Reviews

We highly recommend!



“Marcus guided us through the entire process with professionalism & compassion. His knowledge, thoroughness, and experience ensured the best possible outcome for our case and we highly recommend him.”

- Kylie & Daniel C.

Schedule a Free Consultation



Contact Us