Essential Resources


Welcome to our resources hub, where you'll find 
carefully curated links to trusted resources, articles, 
and tools for staying informed and empowered. Explore sections tailored to meet your needs, from legal insights to government links and recent press coverage.

Government Resources

Explore essential legal tools and information with our curated list of government resources. These links, from federal and state court systems to regulatory agencies and legal aid organizations, provide direct access to authoritative sources. Whether researching laws, filing court documents, or seeking assistance with a legal matter, our collection connects you with trusted government websites like the Department of Justice, local court directories, and state bar associations. These resources are here to help you navigate the legal system with confidence and ease.

Federal Resources

  1. Library of Congress
    An annotated guide offering links to reliable online legal information, including U.S. federal and state laws, international resources, and legal commentary.
  2. USA.gov
    Provides comprehensive information on federal laws and regulations, including guidance on legal issues, copies of government files, and resources for reporting crimes.
  3. Justia - US Federal Government Information
    Justia provides free access to a wide range of legal resources, including federal and state court cases, statutes, regulations, and legal guides.

Educational Blog

Curate blog posts with useful information, like guides, how-tos, or recent legal updates.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam,e 

Recent Posts

By Grombacher February 20, 2026
California Telehealth Company Facing Class Action Over Alleged Physician Misclassification and Unpaid Wages Westlake Village, California – A new class and collective action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Mochi Medical CA, P.C., Mochi Medical, P.A., and Mochi Health Corp., alleging widespread wage-and-hour violations stemming from the alleged misclassification of healthcare providers as independent contractors. The complaint asserts that the defendants operate a telehealth platform for weight management services and a related professional medical group that provides prescription services based on referrals from that platform. According to the lawsuit, the companies uniformly classified physicians and other healthcare professionals as independent contractors despite exercising significant control over their work. The named plaintiff, Dr. Frank Cioppettini, worked remotely as a licensed physician for the defendants from approximately December 10, 2024, to February 14, 2025. The complaint alleges that during this time, he and similarly situated providers were subject to company-directed policies, scheduling requirements, supervision, and performance evaluation, factors that, under California’s “ABC test,” may indicate employee status rather than independent contractor status.  The lawsuit contends that by misclassifying healthcare providers, the defendants failed to provide key protections guaranteed to employees under California law and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). These alleged violations include failure to pay overtime wages, failure to pay all wages owed, failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements, failure to timely pay final wages upon termination, and failure to reimburse necessary business expenses. Specifically, the complaint alleges violations of California Labor Code sections 510 and 1198 for unpaid overtime; failure to pay minimum and all wages; wage statement violations; waiting time penalties; failure to reimburse business expenses; and unfair business practices. According to the complaint, the defendants maintained uniform scheduling and timekeeping practices across states, and the alleged policies were administered from California. The proposed class includes healthcare professionals classified as contractors whose employment relationships were governed by California law within four years prior to the filing of the action. The lawsuit further alleges that hundreds of providers may have been affected. “This action challenges a uniform scheme to misclassify healthcare providers as independent contractors, despite Defendants’ pervasive control over their work and integration of their services into Defendants’ core business. As a result of this misclassification, employees were unlawfully denied overtime, minimum wages, expense reimbursement, accurate wage statements, and timely final pay,” said attorney Marcus Bradley. The case is styled Frank Cioppettini v. Mochi Medical CA, P.C ., et al., Case No. 4:26-cv-01260, USDC Northern District of California.
By Grombacher November 3, 2025
Spotting false advertising in 2025 is tougher than ever. Bradley/Grombacher breaks down how to protect yourself and take legal action.
How to Recover Financially After Catastrophic Injury
By Grombacher September 5, 2025
Experiencing a catastrophic injury can turn your world upside down and can lead to long-term or permanent physical, emotional, and financial challenges.
  1. The Impact of Recent PAGA Compromises
    The Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA), a pivotal piece...

  2. Top 100 Women in Law
    Kiley L. Grombacher cofounded Bradley/Grombacher LLP in 2017...

  3. Clothing Lawsuit Leads to $25 Million Settlement
    An Abercrombie clothing lawsuit has led to a $25 million...


Cases Won

Discover how our experienced legal team has successfully advocated for clients across a wide range of cases. From complex class actions to personal injury claims, our commitment to justice is reflected in the outcomes we achieve. Visit our Case Results page to explore detailed examples of the impactful settlements and verdicts we’ve secured. Our proven track record demonstrates our dedication to protecting your rights and delivering results.

$6,200,000

Valenzuela v. Doe

A woman in a clinical drug trial who was not properly warned of the risks died as a result of taking a defective drug.

$1,675,000

Gaisano v. Doe Tire Company

A family of Filipino visitors was injured when the van in which they were traveling rolled over as a result of tire tread separation...

$6,750,000

Galvan v. Doe

Plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury as a result of a motor vehicle accident.

Bradley/Grombacher Press & PR Links

Media coverage, PR articles, and notable mentions that validate your authority.