Schedule a Free Consultation: (866) 881-0403
Schedule a Free Consultation: (866) 881-0403

What Is Considered Off-The-Clock-Work in California?

Bradley/Grombacher, LLP • Sep 21, 2017

California employees are entitled to protections under state and federal regulations. Being aware of your rights can help to protect you in the event that your employer is violating existing labor laws at the state or federal level.


What Is Considered Off-The-Clock-Work in California?

One of the most common situations that leads to legal claims brought forward by employees has to do with off-the-clock work. When your employer violates this, you may be entitled to bring a wage and hour lawsuit against him or her.


State laws and federal laws generally require employers to pay non-exempted employees wages for all of the time in which that individual works. This is typically interpreted to mean any time that the employee is required to be on duty at a prescribed workplace or on the employer’s premises, at any time during which the employee is permitted or suffered to work, whether or not required to do so.


Active productive labor includes all hours worked. If an employer attempts to encourage you to engage in off-the-clock work that you will not be paid for, this could be a violation of California labor laws.

Working time in California is different from other states because it is not limited only to hours worked in active productive labor. Unauthorized overtime, as one such example, could also be included in terms of hours for which the employee should be paid.



What Is Off-The-Clock Work?

An employer is responsible for paying an employee for off-the-clock work, including time worked after or before a scheduled shift, if the employer should have known or did know that the employee worked those hours.

Common examples of off-the-clock work in California include:


  • work that an employer does,
  • working during a required rest or meal break,
  • redoing a project or correcting problems at the employer’s request,
  • post-shift work,
  • pre-shift work, and
  • administrative work.


In some situations, California employers may attempt to engage in off-the-clock work violations by using payroll practices that only pay employees for the time they are scheduled to work, even though they may be still under the employer’s control after the shift ends. This leads to wages in which the employee does not receive the appropriate payment for his or her off-the-clock work.


Employees in California are entitled to be paid for working off-the-clock, but it is important to remember that supervisors or employers may not always be explicit about requiring off-the-clock work. In some situations the employer may suggest or encourage off-the-clock work in order to avoid paying out the hourly wage due to that employee for the entire time they are working.


If you believe that you have been subjected to an off-the-clock work violation, an experienced wage and hour attorney in California can help. The lawyers at Bradley/Grombacher can help you with your California wage and hour claim, contact us today.


By Kiley L. Grombacher 21 Jun, 2023
Bradley/Grombacher LLP
Abercrombie Clothing Lawsuit Leads to $25 Million Dollar Settlement
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 16 May, 2023
An Abercrombie clothing lawsuit has led to a $25 million settlement over allegations that employees were required to purchase the clothing they were selling in the store.
Join Us For The 2022 Class Action Litigation Conference!
By Marcus J. Bradley 14 Sep, 2022
The program will feature an update of Pending Cases in the 9th Circuit with some SCOTUS discussion, and several important technical issues required for bringing and defending class actions.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 22 Jun, 2022
Marcus Bradley is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of his practice on complex consumer litigation, class actions, mass torts, product liability, personal injury, and more.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 21 Jun, 2022
Kiley Grombacher is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of her practice in complex litigation including consumer and employment class actions, product liability, and pharmaceutical mass torts.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 12 May, 2022
The Harris Martin's MDL Conference is focusing on recalled infant formula and Gardasil.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 12 May, 2022
The retreat is designed for attorneys and provides 6 credit hours of continuing legal education (CLE). During the event, Attorney Grombacher will be a featured speaker presenting on PAGA: What's Next After Viking River Cruises?
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 23 Aug, 2021
At Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, we invite you to attend HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Neutrogena Sunscreen Litigation. Learn more:
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 17 Nov, 2020
Bradley/Grombacher Law More parents are reporting the downside of school spirit – cheerleading injuries that can be catastrophic and life altering.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 18 Oct, 2020
Zoosk and its parent company have been hit with a class-action lawsuit after a May 2020 data breach by a group that calls itself the "ShinyHunters" compromised 30 million users.
More Posts
Share by: