Schedule a Free Consultation: (866) 881-0403
Schedule a Free Consultation: (866) 881-0403

LA County Must Face Unpaid Overtime Wages Lawsuit by Home Health Care Workers

Bradley/Grombacher, LLP • Nov 01, 2017

A federal judge in California recently denied a motion by the County of Los Angeles to dismiss an unpaid overtime lawsuit involving 169,000 home health care employees. The judge ruled that the County did not qualify for immunity under the 11th Amendment because it is not an arm of the state.

The wage and hour lawsuit alleges that 169,000 employees are owed unpaid overtime wages and are affected by unfair employment practices.


County’s Request Denied in Unpaid Overtime Wages Suit

The County of Los Angeles argued that it protected by the 11th Amendment’s sovereign immunity clause due to the statutory role it plays in facilitating the state’s In-Home Supportive Services Social Welfare Program (“IHHS”). The plaintiffs, however, argue they are owed unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).


The plaintiffs, in this case, wanted the unpaid overtime wages lawsuit to include class members who were owed overtime wages after January 1, 2015. The Department of Labor had marked this date to remove an FLSA overtime exemption that previously applied to employees working within IHSS.

Litigation associated with those amended regulations put the enactment of the overtime changes at the federal level on hold, but later a DC Circuit Court ruling confirmed the decision to extend these overtime protections to individuals in the home health care work industry. Following the Circuit Court ruling, the Department of Labor announced the overtime exemption rules for IHHS workers would be enforced beginning November 12, 2015.

The County of Los Angeles argued that it should be categorized as an arm of the state because the “functions performed by the County in administering the IHHS program [were] pursuant to state law” and therefore, the County had no authority to pay IHSS workers overtime without the express consent of the state.


A five-factor test was used to determine whether the entity was an arm of the state. Ultimately the judge determined that while the County performed a central government function it was still given discretion in how it operated its local programs and the 11th amendment did not apply.

The Supreme Court stated in June of 2016 that it would not review any DC circuit court decisions associated with the extension of federal wage an hour protection to the majority of home care workers.


Employee Rights to Unpaid Overtime Wages

Employers of non-exempted workers have a responsibility to comply with state and federal rules when it comes to paying overtime. Companies must pay these employees for all hours in which the employee was under the control of the employer.


Company policies that try to avoid the payment of owed overtime may be at risk of an unpaid overtime lawsuit.

In recent years, many companies have come under fire for not considering all the circumstances in which an employee is engaged in his or her job, including requiring employees wait to clock in or out until advised by a supervisor. Employees affected by such issues may wish to talk to an employment attorney about filing an unpaid overtime wages lawsuit.


You can receive a free evaluation of your potential case from the experienced employment attorneys at Bradley/Grombacher by filling out the form on this page.


By Kiley L. Grombacher 21 Jun, 2023
Bradley/Grombacher LLP
Abercrombie Clothing Lawsuit Leads to $25 Million Dollar Settlement
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 16 May, 2023
An Abercrombie clothing lawsuit has led to a $25 million settlement over allegations that employees were required to purchase the clothing they were selling in the store.
Join Us For The 2022 Class Action Litigation Conference!
By Marcus J. Bradley 14 Sep, 2022
The program will feature an update of Pending Cases in the 9th Circuit with some SCOTUS discussion, and several important technical issues required for bringing and defending class actions.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 22 Jun, 2022
Marcus Bradley is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of his practice on complex consumer litigation, class actions, mass torts, product liability, personal injury, and more.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 21 Jun, 2022
Kiley Grombacher is a founder and partner at Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, and focuses much of her practice in complex litigation including consumer and employment class actions, product liability, and pharmaceutical mass torts.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 12 May, 2022
The Harris Martin's MDL Conference is focusing on recalled infant formula and Gardasil.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 12 May, 2022
The retreat is designed for attorneys and provides 6 credit hours of continuing legal education (CLE). During the event, Attorney Grombacher will be a featured speaker presenting on PAGA: What's Next After Viking River Cruises?
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 23 Aug, 2021
At Bradley/Grombacher, LLP, we invite you to attend HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Neutrogena Sunscreen Litigation. Learn more:
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 17 Nov, 2020
Bradley/Grombacher Law More parents are reporting the downside of school spirit – cheerleading injuries that can be catastrophic and life altering.
By Bradley/Grombacher, LLP 18 Oct, 2020
Zoosk and its parent company have been hit with a class-action lawsuit after a May 2020 data breach by a group that calls itself the "ShinyHunters" compromised 30 million users.
More Posts
Share by: