Beauty Products

Are Your Beauty Products Properly Advertised?

Fighting for Victims of Deceptive Advertising Nationwide

The Food Drug and Cosmetic Act defines cosmetics as articles intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions.

Included in this definition are products such as:

  • Skin creams
  • Lotions
  • Perfumes
  • Lipsticks
  • Fingernail polishes
  • Eye and facial make-up preparations
  • Shampoos
  • Permanent waves
  • Hair colors
  • Toothpastes
  • Deodorants
  • And any material intended for use as a component of a cosmetic product

Don’t delay – act now by scheduling a free initial consultation with to see if you have grounds to file a false advertising lawsuit. Contact us online or call Bradley/Grombacher LLP at (888) 418-7094 today to arrange yours. Accepting clients nationwide!

According to a study done by Valdosta State University, four out of five beauty care brands do not deliver their own claims. Using misleading advertisement, these brands are claiming that their products can make beauty miracles without substantiation. In the previous study mentioned, the authors examined 757 claims by beauty and personal care brands from 300 full-page ads.

These ads are from popular magazines, such as:

  • Vogue
  • Marie Claire
  • And Glamour

All the claims in the ads are classified into four labels: outright lie, omission, vague, and acceptable. According to the study, out of the 757 claims, 621 are only claims, 18% of the claims are acceptable, while only 14% of the claims are trustworthy.

What Are the Types of Deceptive Advertising?beauty products on a table

Deceptive advertising and labeling take many forms when it comes to beauty products but some recent trends include:

  • Labeling Products as Clean that Contain Toxic Chemicals
  • Labeling Products as Vegan when they Contain Beeswax or other Animal Byproducts.
  • Labeling Products as “Oil Free” That Actually Contain Oil
  • Labeling Phyto-Retinol Products as Retinol

If you have purchased beauty products and believe you may have been the victim of false advertising on beauty products, our attorneys are happy to provide a free consultation. Accepting clients nationwide!

There is no cost or obligation associated with the case evaluation, so submit your information now. Contact us online or call (888) 418-7094 to schedule a free initial consultation.

Beauty Product Class Action Lawsuit Investigation Evaluation

Fill out the form below for a free case evaluation. If you qualify, a lawyer will contact you to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please enter your City.
  • Please enter your state.
  • Please enter your product.
  • Please enter the date you purchased the product.
  • Please enter a message.
  • Get Our Newsletter!

    • Please check box if you would like to subscribe to our newsletter
  • Any information you submit is intended to be protected by attorney-client privilege, but it is possible that attorneys may be ordered by a court of law to produce such information in certain legal situations. Also, you are not formally represented by a law firm unless and until a contract of representation is signed by you and the law firm.

    • Please check box if you acknowledge information above

Highly Esteemed & Accomplished

    • Top 50 Settlements_All Practice Areas_California 2017
    • Super Lawyers: 2018 - 2020 (3 Years)
    • Top 50 Settlements_All Practice Areas_California 2019
    • Top 50 Settlements_Class Actions_California 2016
    • Super Lawyers Rising Star
  • Galvan v. Doe $6,750,000
  • Valenzuela v. Doe $6,200,000
  • Gaisano v. Doe Tire Company $1,675,000
  • Smuckler v. City of South Pasadena $4,000,000
  • Gutierrez v. Dole $2,455,000
  • Gould v. Casares $2,450,000
  • Gonzalez v. Brown $2,000,000
  • Silberberg v. Titus $1,800,000
  • Doe Plaintiffs v. Doe Tire Company $1,675,000
  • LaVerne v. Doe $1,400,000

Success Stories

    We highly recommend!

    “Marcus guided us through the entire process with professionalism & compassion. His knowledge, thoroughness, and experience ensured the best possible outcome for our case and we highly recommend him.”

    - Kylie & Daniel C.
    Marcus Bradley is a wonderful lawyer.

    “This settlement made it possible for my sister to have a much better life than I thought would be possible.”

    - Ellen T.

Schedule a Free Consultation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.