“Not Being Heard Is No Reason For Silence”  – Victor Hugo

Bradley/Grombacher gives a voice to those injured by big insurance, pharmaceutical and Fortune 500 companies and works tirelessly to vindicate the rights of our clients who have been wronged.

Anesthesiologist Sues Mass. General Hospital in False Claims Act Lawsuit

A Boston anesthesiologist recently argued before a district court judge that her False Claims Act lawsuit has sufficient merit to move forward. The lawsuit accuses Boston’s renowned Massachusetts General Hospital of Medicare and Medicaid fraud.

The plaintiff, Dr. Lisa Wollman, alleges that Mass. General, her former employer, engaged in the practice of double-booking surgeries and having residents and fellows perform the procedures without a supervising doctor. According to the lawsuit, this practice is a material violation of Medicare and Medicaid regulations.

Allegations in the False Claims Act Lawsuit

According to the False Claims Act lawsuit filed by Dr. Wollman, the hospital’s “policy” provided financial incentives for its doctors to perform more surgeries yet never disclosed to patients that their doctor would be going back and forth between operating rooms.

Legal news service Law 360 reported that lawyers representing Mass. General asked a federal judge to dismiss Wollman’s False Claims Act case on the grounds that federal regulations dictating when a surgeon must be present in the operating room are vague.

According to Mass. General’s motion to dismiss, Medicare and Medicaid permit surgeons to “decide what parts of surgeries are critical or key and therefore what they need to be in the room for and what they do not need to be present for.”

Medicare and Medicaid regulations allow fellows and residents to perform some parts of surgery without a supervising doctor in the room, but federal healthcare rules require a licensed surgeon be present for all “key and critical parts,” Law 360 writes.

Mass. General’s motion to dismiss also states, that the False Claims Act lawsuit should be dismissed because Wollman did not name a specific surgery, did not provide proof of improper billing, did not name an instance of overlapping surgeries, and did not detail any particular surgery during which a licensed surgeon was missing during “key or critical” portions.

Wollman counters these claims by arguing that “the fraud occurred in MGH operating rooms sealed off from regular traffic” and not the insurance claims processing department. She also maintains that, as a physician, she does not have access to all patients’ insurance information and claims, but said its “highly implausible” that “none of the thousands of patients involved in these surgeries were covered” by the federal health plan.

Wollman states that while she doesn’t have written documentation, she personally witnessed entire surgeries performed without a licensed surgeon ever present. The False Claims Act lawsuit also alleges that:

  • Patients were endangered by at least five surgeons who regularly performed simultaneous surgeries,
  • The doctors committed fraud against the government by billing for surgeries for which they were absent during “critical portions” or didn’t attend at all, “leaving the work to unsupervised trainees.”
  • Between 2010 and 2015, Mass General orthopedic surgeons repeatedly kept patients anesthetized longer than medically necessary or safe so they could juggle two to three operations at the same time, according to the newspaper.

According to Dr. Wollman, not only were Medicare and Medicaid billed for the additional anesthesia the alleged practice “constitutes unnecessary, excessive and dangerous prescribing.”

The False Claims Act suit states that “this often meant an unwitting patient was left fully anesthetized — unconscious, paralyzed, intubated, dependent on a ventilator to breathe — for longer than medically necessary, often in the care of trainees, without the backup of a properly qualified surgeon, despite legal requirements.’’

The False Claims Act lawsuit referenced above is filed in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts and is US et al v. Massachusetts General Hospital Inc. et al, case number 1:15-cv-11890.

Do you have knowledge that your employer violated the False Claims Act by committing Medicare fraud, Medicaid fraud, or other type of insurance billing fraud? See if you have a case by filling out the form on this page for a FREE and confidential case evaluation. 

Categories

Request a Free Consultation

If you feel that your rights have been violated, call our experienced attorneys for a free evaluation.

Our Notable Victories

  • Galvan v. Doe $6,750,000
  • Valenzuela v. Doe $6,200,000
  • Gaisano v. Doe Tire Company $1,675,000
  • Smuckler v. City of South Pasadena $4,000,000
  • Gutierrez v. Dole $2,455,000
  • Gould v. Casares $2,450,000
  • Gonzalez v. Brown $2,000,000
  • Silberberg v. Titus $1,800,000
  • Doe Plaintiffs v. Doe Tire Company $1,675,000
  • LaVerne v. Doe $1,400,000
/

Reasons Why Clients Continue to Choose Us

  • No upfront payments required. We get paid when you do!
  • Excellent communication & access to our attorneys.
  • Proven track record of success. Just take a look at our cases!
  • Hablamos Español! We can assist you in both English and Spanish.

Highly Esteemed & Accomplished

  • We highly recommend!

    “Marcus guided us through the entire process with professionalism & compassion. His knowledge, thoroughness, and experience ensured the best possible outcome for our case and we highly recommend him.”

    - Kylie & Daniel C.
  • Marcus Bradley is a wonderful lawyer.

    “This settlement made it possible for my sister to have a much better life than I thought would be possible.”

    - Ellen T.
/

Your Rights Deserve Justice

Schedule a Free Consultation
  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.